Quantcast bluetooth virtual laser keyboard - Bluetooth Virtual Laser Keyboard
ubergizmo

Bluetooth Virtual Laser Keyboard

Posted on Jul 27, 06 10:12 AM PDT


Bluetooth Virtual Laser Keyboard
Talk about touch typing. You can literally do that with the Bluetooth Laser Virtual Keyboard from ThinkGeek. This 3.5" high device will project a virtual keybard onto where your keyboard would normally be in a red diode laser. Each key pressed will emit a click sound to keep things familiar. Just pair this up with any other Bluetooth-enabled cellphone or PDA and you can start sending out a flurry of emails and text messages in no time. Its diminutive size also makes it a great traveling companion. It is compatible with PalmOS 5, PocketPC 2003, Windows Smartphone, Symbian OS, and Windows 2000/XP with limited Mac OSX Support. Purchase one today for $189.99.

Read...   Add a comment



Your Comments

Comments will be published immediately if you use a Disqus, Facebook or Twitter account. Anonymous comments will be moderated.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Legacy Comments

By iphone user , 21/11/07 9:51 PM (CommentID #372602)


okay so u all think its pretty bad and i think i agree with u all. But does any1 know if it is compatible with the iPhone

Reply | Direct Link

By Gt , 12/09/06 3:50 AM (CommentID #045964)


For $190 most of us wouldn't buy one.. and to work on somewhere dead flat is going to be hard to press your fingers on it.

Reply | Direct Link

By amber , 23/08/06 8:31 AM (CommentID #041610)


i think the laser keyboard is one of the best ideas but its just too much.... i think it at least be 100-150 dollars... people dont want to buy something that much

Reply | Direct Link

By ScreamingPict , 28/07/06 6:17 AM (CommentID #035771)


I played with one a year or so ago. It was painful to use as you had to take your fingers out of the beam between each keypress.

Also the Bluetooth code was painfully bad. If it implements a HID-Keyboard it should be fully compatible with any bluetooth device that supports HID-host. If it does not 'fully' support Mac OSX then that implies that it is still not properly resolved.

Reply | Direct Link

By WaT , 27/07/06 3:50 PM (CommentID #035743)


That's not new, it has been around for several years now.

Reply | Direct Link


Featured Posts


Top Stories


Advertisement