
A study by J. Gold Associates have come to a conclusion that ditching your notebook after an average of 3 years is much more cost-effective compared to extending the notebook’s lifespan by up to 5 years. It seems as though the costs mount up when one wants to keep a machine for 5 years, and this amount would actually cost more than purchasing a new notebook after the third year. After all, the survey pointed to the cost of repairing a failed notebook while under warranty at $1,070, compared to around $1,525 when not under warranty. Another two additional years in the lifecycle might actually require you to cough up another $1,050 on the assumption that your notebook fails at least once a year. What kind of notebooks are they using, Dells? That’s just a cheap jibe – I myself am using a Dell, and in the entire three years I have used it, it has not failed on me even once (keeping fingers crossed). No idea which brand(s) did they test to come up with such a conclusion. What do you think?
Related articles:Bio computer grows wheatgrass using its own heat
Apple is considering fuel-cell-powered MacBooks
AT&T Battery Charger made from recycled water bottles
| Ubergizmo founders on   |
|  Eliane Fiolet  |  Hubert Nguyen  |
