Apple and Google spent more on patents than R&D in 2011

The New York Times’ excellent iEconomy series wrapped up this morning with a look into the current patent wars going on between Apple and other technology companies. A close read reveals several disconcerting facts: over $20 billion was spent on patent litigation and acquisition in 2011, which a hefty chunk of money. Also, in 2011, Google and Apple spent more on patents than on research and development. If there was ever a statistic that backs up the “patents are hindering creativity” argument, you’ve got it.

Of course, that individual statistic takes into account Google’s patent-motivated $12 billion purchase of Motorola. Still, the feature story does give some convincing evidence that a revision of the software patent system is in order. It details the story of a software company developing voice-recognition tools that was given an ultimatum: sell the company or get sued. It also details how Apple’s CEO during the last decade, Steve Jobs, decided to start patenting everything–even rounded icons–after a huge lawsuit with Creative over the iPod.

The whole story is worth a read at the New York Times.

You May Also Like

Related Articles on Ubergizmo

Popular Right Now

Exit mobile version

Discover more from Ubergizmo

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Exit mobile version