ProductCore i5-4690TCore i9-7900X X-series
Brand Intel Intel
Street Price (Approx) ~ $235
Search low Core i5-4690T price (Amazon)
~ $920
Search low Core i9-7900X X-series price (Amazon)
# CPU Cores 410
Frequency (GHz) 2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Cache (MB) 613.75
TDP (Watts) 45 W140 W
Product Segment DesktopDesktop
Status ReleasedReleased
Announced On 2014-03-012017-03-01
TechnicalsCore i5-4690TCore i9-7900X X-series
Dimensions (2D) 37.5x37.5 mm
Conflict Free? 11
# CPU Cores 410
Threads/Core 420
Frequency (GHz) 2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Turbo Frequency (GHz) 3.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Cache (MB) 613.75
Instructions Width (bits) 6464
Instructions Extensions SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0SSE4.1/4.2, AVX 2.0, AVX-512
Lithography Process (nm) 22 nm14 nm
TDP (Watts) 45 W140 W
Max RAM 32 GB128 GB
RAM Types DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5VDDR4-2666
# Memory Channels 24
Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec) 25.6GB/s
Max CPU / Package 11
PCI-E Version 33
PCI-E Configurations Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4
PCI-E Max Lanes # 1644
Compatible Sockets FCLGA1150FCLGA2066
Intel Turbo Boost Version 22
Intel V-Pro Yes
Intel Hyper-Thread NoYes
Intel Virtualization (VTX) YesYes
Intel Directed I/O (VTD) YesYes
Intel Ext. Page Tables (EPT) Yes
Intel TSX Sync. Extensions No
Intel 64 YesYes
Intel MyWiFi Yes
Idle States Yes
Enhanced Speedstep Yes
Thermal MonitoringTech. Yes
Intel ID Protect Yes
Intel SIPP Yes
Intel SMB Advantage Yes
Intel AES New Instructions YesYes
Intel Secure Key Yes
Intel OS Guard Yes
Trusted Execution Yes
Execution Disable YesYes

 

Intel Core i5-4690T vs. Intel Core i9-7900X X-series Specs & Speed Benchmarks

CPU Speed

These tests are designed to stress the CPU components of the processor

Geekbench 4 Multi, Higher is better

Geekbench 4 Single, Higher is better

Memory Bandwidth (GB/Sec), Higher is better

 

Performance/Price (Value)

Some of the same tests as above, but shown as a relation to the price. This shows what performance you get for each additional dollar spent. The higher the score, and the more value you get for your money

Geekbench 4 Multi / Price, Higher is better