Alcatel Pixi 4 (4) vs. Alcatel alcatel 5v

Alcatel Pixi 4 (4)
  • 4" (800x480) TFT LCD
  • 8GB
    MT6580M SoC     4GB Storage
  • 2-MP 1 Rear Camera
  • 1500 mAh
Alcatel alcatel 5v

Specifications Highlights
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
ProductPixi 4 (4) (Launched 2016-01-01)alcatel 5v (Launched 2018-07-01)
Display4" 800x480 TFT LCD
Rear Camera(s)
  • 2-MP (Primary)
Selfie Camera(s)
  • 2-MP
Computing
  • MT6580M SoC
  • 8GB RAM
  • 4GB Storage
  • MicroSD (32GB max.)
Battery1500 mAh
DesignIP Rating, 121.3x64.4x9.7 mm (4.78 x 2.54 x 0.38 inches)IP Rating
Advertising
Display
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
TypeTFT LCD
Diagonal (inches)4"
Display/Body Ratio58.3%
Resolution800x480
Sharpness (PPI)233 PPI
Features
  • Multitouch
Color Depth24 bit (16,777,216 Colors)
Primary Camera
Product NamePixi 4 (4)
Megapixel2-MP
Hardware Features
  • Flash
  • HDR Photo
Video Resolutions
  • 1080p/30fps
Battery
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
Battery TypeLi-Ion
Battery Capacity (mAh)1500 mAh
Battery Features
  • Removable
Talk Time10 hours
Computing
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
Processor BrandMediatek
Processor NameMT6580M
Processor # Cores4
Main Processor Frequency (GHz)1.3 GHz
RAM Options8GB
Internal Storage Options4GB
Memory Card TypeMicroSD
Mem. Card Max. Size32GB
Operating System + VersionAndroid 6.0
Communications
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
Modem Features
  • GPRS
  • EDGE
WiFi Speed
  • b
  • g
  • n
WiFi Features
  • Hotspot
  • WiFi Direct
Bluetooth VersionBluetooth 4.0
Bluetooth Features
  • A2DP
Connector TypeMicro USB
Sim Card 0
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
NameSIM0
SIM TypeMicro SIM
Multimedia
Product NamePixi 4 (4)alcatel 5v
Audio Alerts
  • VIBRATION
  • MP3
  • WAV
Audio Features
  • Loudspeaker
  • 3.5mm Port
  • FM Radio
Audio Formats
  • MP3
  • WAV
Video Formats
  • MP4
  • H.264
Sensors
  • Accelerometer
  • GPS
  • A-GPS

Alcatel Pixi 4 (4) vs. Alcatel alcatel 5v Specs & Speed Benchmarks

Antutu

Higher is better

3DMark Unlimited Icestorm

Higher is better

Battery Capacity (mAh)

Higher is better